Also to say

purple plums and silver colander

"Damson Plums" by Isosceles (Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic) http://www.flickr.com/photos/isosceles/232648403/

that we have graded
the Wikipedia Article assignments
and emailed rubrics
to you.

Let us know
if you
did not
receive them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Week Fifteen, Finals Week, and Assignments List

man running and straining

"Hastings Half Marathon" by AndyWilson (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic) http://www.flickr.com/photos/by_andy/3356605153/

It’s all here both for Week Fifteen and Final Examination Week.

Reflective Analytical Essay Rough Draft

The Reflective Analytical Essay rough draft is due early this week (week fifteen). Don’t forget to add the three questions for your reviewers at the end of your draft.

As we have done in the past, form groups on the Reflective Analytical Essay peer response and final drafts page on a first-come-first-served basis.

Creel, Gibney or Kuhne

See the course Google Calendar for due dates.

Peer review

After turning in the Reflective Analytical Essay rough drafts we will focus on the peer review process.

For a review of peer review in general please read the ENGL 1111 Peer Response Overview.

Then view the specific Reflective Analytical Essay Peer Response Guidelines.

You must respond to all of the drafts posted on time by the members of your group.

Place your responses to the three questions posted by the writer as well as the other questions from the Reflective Analytical Essay Peer Response Guidelines in the comments section at the bottom of each rough draft page.

Please be thorough and thoughtful in your responses to your colleagues.

Also, think carefully about how what you are noticing in your peers’ work can help you in your own writing.

See the course Google Calendar for the peer response due date.

***Reflective Analytical Essay Final Draft***

The final draft of the Reflective Analytical Essay is due two weeks after the Reflective Analytical Essay rough draft deadline. As always, see the course Google Calendar for due dates.

(Please note the the deadline for the final drafts is firm.  Late submissions will receive a late-submission grade penalty and few (if any) instructor comments.)

One Final Task

After you have submitted your Reflective Analytical Essay final draft, slept a bit, and maybe had your favorite caffeinated drink, we ask that you take a few moments to provide responses to three Class Evaluation discussions (D2L): “Effective Tools,” “Ineffective Tools,” and “Course Goals.”  We take your feedback seriously, and we use your recommendations to revise the course to make it more a better learning experience for future students. See the course Google Calendar for the course evaluation discussion due date.

Week Fifteen and Final Examination Week Assignment List

1.  Reflective Analytical Essay rough draft due at the beginning of Week Fifteen.

2.  Small Group Peer Responses to the Reflective Analytical Essay rough drafts are due during Week Fifteen.

3.  Reflective Analytical Essay final draft due during the Final Examinations Week.

4.  Course Evaluation discussions (“Effective Tools,” “Ineffective Tools,” and “Course Goals”) due during the Final Examinations Week.

See the course Google Calendar for more specific due date information.

 

Posted in Weekly Assignments, Weekly Class Notes | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Week Fourteen Notes and Assignments List

reflection of mountain in lake

"Reflection Lakes" by Jheat (Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic) http://www.flickr.com/photos/jheat/773715297/

Drafting

Please use week fourteen to draft your Reflective Analytical Essay rough drafts, which will be due on the wiki on Monday of week fifteen.  Students should post rough draft on the appropriate wiki page: Creel or Gibney or Kuhne

Edit Survival II – The Collaboration Wikipedia Article Effort

As you prepare to draft your Reflective Analytical Essay, please revisit the Wikipedia article that you and your collaborative partners attempted to improve.  Has the edit remained?  Has the article reverted to an earlier version?  Perhaps some of your edits remain while others have disappeared.  Respond to the questions noted in the D2L Discussion titled “Edit Survival II – The Collaboration Wikipedia Article Effort.”

For week fourteen

1) Draft the Reflective Analytical Essay assignment, which is due at the beginning of Week Fifteen.

3) Complete the “Edit Survival II” discussion in D2L.

See the course Google Calendar for due dates.

Posted in Weekly Assignments, Weekly Class Notes | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Instructors’ Responses to Week Twelve Work

Please return to the Wikipedia article collaboration pages and view the instructors’ comments at the bottom of the wiki page (or in the page if Kuhne is your responder) for more detailed comments about your group’s Week Twelve work.

"Collaboration," by edladesigner (Attribution CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) http://www.flickr.com/photos/edlabdesigner/4025619497/

We noticed that many of the groups are struggling to use sources appropriately. Just as the college does not allow plagiarism, neither does Wikipedia. Material added to Wikipedia should be quoted, paraphrased, or summarized as appropriate.  Citations should be included both in Wikipedia and on the collaboration page.

If your new text intertwines with old text, use formatting to show what is new and what is old on the collaboration page. For example, underline or color-code the new text on the collaboration page.

Additionally, don’t forget that actually adding the text to the Wikipedia article is part of the assignment.  Merely putting the text on the collaboration page does not complete the assignment.

Often the evaluation of the six sources is performed by two or three people.  Many of the evaluations, therefore, are uneven or incomplete.  Please review your team’s evaluations and complete the reviews.  Also, make sure that you add a complete MLA Works Cited entry for each source and that you add a brief paragraph at the end of each source that reveals the outcome of your evaluation (i. e. is the source useful or not?).

Please review the assignment’s scoring rubric; this is what will guide the instructors’ evaluations.

Check the Google calendar for the final due date early next week.

 

Posted in General Info | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Week Thirteen

two bubbles reflecting city scene

"City Refraction, City Reflection" by Irargerich (Attribution 2.0 Generic) http://www.flickr.com/photos/lrargerich/3203435803/

Finishing the Wikipedia Article Collaboration Pages

The Wikipedia Article Collaboration Pages and edits to your Wikipedia articles are due on Monday of week thirteen (the coming week if you are reading this on Wednesday-Saturday, and this week if you are reading this on Sunday or Monday. If you are reading this on Tuesday and didn’t finish the assignment, then you’ve got a little trouble.

And now, on with the fun!

Introduction to the Reflective Analytical Essay assignment

This week we begin the final major writing assignment for the course, the Reflective Analytical writing assignment. In content and format, this assignment requires you to use all of the skills we have learned and developed this semester. There are several ideas to think about based on our earlier work as you approach this assignment.

  • Remember: the new argument articulated in the thesis should be more nuanced (not over-simplified) than things you have argued earlier in the semester
  • Whatever you write should address your experience as a Wikipedian.
  • In the final essay, a higher quality standard will be applied to various writing items such as thesis statements; body paragraph development (claim-evidence-explanation-closing); the accurate and effective use of sources (introducing the source, using signal phrases, formatting the direct quote correctly, using accurate in-text citations, and signaling the use of summaries and paraphrases where necessary); MLA Works Cited accuracy; and overall quality of the writing.

Thesis and claim work for Reflective Analytical Essay

Given your understanding of the assignment, let’s work on revising or drafting your working thesis statement.

Some questions that might lead to a more nuanced approach:

  • In your experience working with Wikipedia in this class, what were some of your most frustrating moments? Why were these moments frustrating? How did they affect your thinking about Wikipedia or its use?
  • In your experience working with Wikipedia in this class, what were some of your most rewarding or fun moments? Why were these moments rewarding or fun? How did they affect your thinking about Wikipedia or its use?
  • If you had to tell someone what you like about this class, what would it be? Why?
  • If you had to tell someone what you don’t like about this class, what would it be? Why?
  • How has learning more about Wikipedia changed the way you think about it?
  • How has learning more about Wikipedia changed the way you use it?
  • How has learning more about Wikipedia changed the way you think about information on the web in general?
  • How has writing in Wikipedia changed the way you write or think about writing?
  • If there were one thing you could change about Wikipedia, what would it be?
  • If there were one thing you would never change about Wikipedia what would it be?

As you draft this thesis statement ask yourself these questions:

  • is the thesis nuanced (not over-simplified)?
  • is the thesis arguable?
  • can you predict what the structure of the essay will be based on the thesis statement?

Once you have written the first draft of your thesis statement, start thinking about the body paragraphs that will support this thesis.

Based on the working thesis statement, brainstorm six claims for the body paragraphs that might be used to support this thesis statement. (Remember claim statements? Each body paragraph has one, then has evidence and explanation to support it, followed by a closing.)

We are asking you draft six initial claims not because the essay needs six body paragraphs but because it is good to brainstorm more ideas than you might actually need. Then you can pick the best. Think of creating six claims as a good stretching exercise.

When you’ve drafted your working thesis statement and claims, post them in the Reflective Analytical Working Thesis Discussion in D2L. Read at least one of your peers’ postings in this Discussion and respond to it by suggesting one additional claim she/he might use to support the working thesis statement he/she has proposed.

Works Cited

To review the details of drafting an accurate Works Cited page for the final essay, please see these pages:

Posted in Weekly Class Notes | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Week Thirteen: Assignments List

For week thirteen

1) Complete the Wikipedia Article collaboration assignment

2) Read the Reflective Analytical Essay assignment

3) Complete the Reflective Analytical Working Thesis discussion in D2L

See the course Google Calendar for due dates.

Posted in Weekly Assignments | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Instructors’ Responses to Week Eleven Work

Please return to your Wikipedia article collaboration page to review the instructors’ comments on your Week Eleven work.

We want to draw your attention to two issues: evaluating sources and the proposed 350-word addition to the Wikipedia article.  Two former  groups wrestled with these concepts in ways that we appreciate, and they are the “Being Alive” group and the “Tears in Heaven” group.  It will be worth your while to review these two collaboration pages to witness the following:

1) Note how thorough most of their source evaluations are.  Note, too, how the layout of the evaluation makes it so much easier for the reader to find key information.

(One item that we’d like everyone to include, however, is the Work Cited entry information at the beginning of each source.)

2) Note how both groups have done some significant work in developing their proposed 350-word addition/edit to their Wikipedia article.  The “Being Alive” group is probably ready to post their work in the “Being Alive” article.  Once the “Tears in Heaven” group makes final decisions, they, too, should post their work in their article.  Once groups start posting these changes, they should monitor the article’s changes to see if their edits have survived (and why or why not).

3)  A hint about posting new text to your Wikipedia article:  we recommend that you add small portions (one sentence or so) at a time.  Because most (if not all) of you are novice Wikipedia editors, Wikipedia is suspicious of large edits from you.  Adding your 350-word edits in small increments makes it more likely that they will stay in the article.

Keep thinking about the work that you are doing together and within the Wikipedia article.  All of it will be useful for your final assignment, the Reflective Analytical Essay.

See the course Google Calendar for due dates.  Also, please continue to reference the Wikipedia article scoring rubric.

Finally, if you have questions or concerns, please contact your instructor.

Posted in Weekly Assignments | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Week Twelve Notes and Assignments List

wikipedia logo with pieces missing

"Wikipedia-Logo" by throwthedamnthing (CC BY 2.0) http://www.flickr.com/photos/9473541@N02/2068301407/

Continuing Wikipedia Article Work

This week, each group is responsible for the following items:

  • Add necessary revisions to the action plan on the collaboration page
  • Follow-up with the consensus building on the talk page as necessary; add a link to the talk page to show recent interactions
  • Evaluate and add to the collaboration page 6 of the 6 new sources for evaluation
  • As a group, also add one of the following to your Wikipedia article and explain the change on your collaboration page:
  • make changes in organization (move things around)
  • add subheading
  • add image
  • add table of information
  • edit for style or grammar
  • add citation for uncited material that already existed in the article before you began working on it
  • Continue drafting 350 words of changes and post some portion of this draft on the collaboration page

See the course Google Calendar for due dates.

Posted in Weekly Assignments, Weekly Class Notes | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Instructors’ Responses to Week Ten Work

play nice by tarale, cc BY-NC 2.0

We have reviewed the work from Week Ten on the Wikipedia Article Collaboration pages.  Please return to your group’s collaboration page, scroll to the bottom of the Comments section, and read the instructor’s comments.

Evaluating Sources

Only half of the groups had sources listed and/or had evaluated them.  This is an absolutely critical portion of your work.  Please use the six criteria from the Purdue OWL web page devoted to evaluating sources.

As you evaluate sources, you must find sources that will help you improve the three criteria you have identified (in other words, not just any old source will do).  Also, as you evaluate the sources, it is key that you keep in mind Wikipedia’s standards, which can be found in both Wikipedia: Identifying Reliable Sources and Wikipedia: Verifiability.  Finally, in your evaluations, please explain the outcome of your analysis (the article is dubious, the article is useful, or the various analytical shades of gray in between).

Good databases

Contrary to popular belief, Google is not the best database :)   Our favorites – and all of them can be found on the MCTC library web site (right column: click “Complete List A-Z with descriptions”)  – include Academic Search Premier, MasterFile Premier, Proquest Newstand, and Pop Culture Universe.  Use these databases and chances are much, much greater that you’ll find quality sources.

Play Nice

A quick show of hands: how many of you have ever been in a small group where you did all of the work? none of the work?   Yeah, well, let’s avoid this imbalance.  The instructors have a very simple definition of “collaboration” – the members of the collaborative group fairly and equally share the work load.  The evidence that you are sharing the work load appears in the “page history” of your collaboration page and the “edit history” of the Wikipedia article.  Sorry, folks, but you can’t hide when the collaboration is done online.

Posted in General Info | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Week Eleven Notes and Assignments List

one match lighting another

"Sharing" by furiousgeorge81 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic) http://www.flickr.com/photos/furiousgeorge81/177926979/

It’s all here for Week Eleven. There is no separate assignments list this week.

Continuing Wikipedia Article Work

As you continue working in your article and on your collaboration page, here are the expectations for this week:

  • Add necessary revisions to the action plan on the collaboration page
  • Evaluate and add to the collaboration page 4 of the 6 new sources for evaluation
  • Make an initial attempt to engage in consensus building on the the talk/discussion page– provide a link from the collaboration page to the talk page where you did this
  • Begin drafting 350 words of changes and post some portion of this draft on the collaboration page

See the course Google Calendar for due dates.

Posted in Weekly Assignments, Weekly Class Notes | Tagged , , | 1 Comment